When I started
A Feast for Crows the
other night, I felt sad. I love
rereading this series, and it's always a bummer to realize that I'm coming to
the end of it. For years now, I've
waited for the fourth installment,
A Dance with Dragons.
George R. R. Martin is not, whatever else he
might be, a speedy writer. He produces
each installment with the slow, methodical deliberation of the three-toed
sloth. However, considering that he's a
genius, I can forgive him this.Now, as
I delve into
Crows once again, I'm considering the top 5 reasons
why Martin is the preeminent fantasy writer of our time...
1. His characters are incredibly real. Almost immediately, you realize that you care
what happens to them. Their wants and
needs, likes and dislikes become yours. I think this is because they aren't heroes--or villains, for that
matter. Martin's world is a world of
grays. Eddard Stark, for example, is
noble and virtuous--almost foolishly so. He allows his ideals to obscure his reality, and he suffers for it. Cersei Lannister is arguably an evil woman,
but Martin very sensitively portrays the disappointments and struggles that
shaped her. In real life, no one is all good--or all bad. One man's hero is another man's villain--it
depends on your point of view. Likewise,
in real life, no one is static. Rather,
who you are changes in response to what you experience. "Good" people turn "bad", and visa
versa. Jaime Lannister's entire outlook
on life changes after he suffers a catastrophic loss. If we're lucky--or unlucky--life occasionally
presents you with an opportunity to critically examine our own
shortcomings. A hero who soldiers on,
consequences be damned, is unrealistic; you can admire him, but you can't identify
with him.
2. Martin is a master of complexity. I think the miracle, here, is not so much the
incredible profusion of characters, plot twists, and ideas but the fact that
they're all comprehensible. Often,
authors who attempt such a high degree of complexity end up with nothing but
confusion. They beat some ideas into the
ground with the proverbial "hammer of fire," while they totally forget about
others. Martin, however, consistently
gives you a world that completely draws you in. And, much like real life, it keeps you guessing. His ability to world-build--and I say this
without reservation--is without match in today's fantasy market.
3. He doesn't fall in love with his
characters. This problem is a personal
pet peeve. The classic example is
Dorothy Sayers and Peter Whimsy. It's
patently obvious, when you read one of her books, that Peter Whimsy is her "Mr.
Perfect." She never met him in real
life, so she created him. A
non-threatening man who never has a weak moment, says an angry word or does
something thoughtless, he's as thrillingly one-dimensional as most
fantasies. He speaks numerous languages,
has numerous erudite interests, and he always prefers going dancing to staying
at home and burping. Honestly, what a
bore. You feel like writing her a letter
explaining that men are just people--and real men are a lot more exciting than
pretend men! Peter Whimsy might be
interesting to her, but he's not interesting to the rest of us. When you fall in love with your character,
it's not real love--the kind of love that encourages truth. When you genuinely love someone, you accept
the worst in them, you criticize them for their own good, you see the best in
them and you refuse to accept anything less. This, however, is more hero worship. When you put someone on a pedestal, you put them far enough away from
you that only their general outline is visible. You can admire them, in the general sense, without having to face their
flaws. If you fall in love with your
character, then you lose your power over it--and, subsequently, you trade in
your role as creator for a new role as a sort of dance partner, whirling around
in an endlessly banal waltz.
4. Martin builds on a solid foundation of real life
issues. I'm so sick of authors who
confuse "high fantasy" with torpid high mindedness. People don't, in fact, always do things for
the "right" reasons. "For the good of
the realm", "for honor", "for love", they're just crutches. Honestly, some authors seem really out of
touch with the world around them. Or
maybe they have messiah complexes. Or
maybe they just don't like real people all that much. Kingdoms rise and fall over stupidity and
pettiness just as often as over noble sentiments--and the interplay of these
differing motivations creates its own problems. Through his characters, Martin weaves level after level of intrigue,
each of which masterfully exploits them.
5. Another personal pet peeve is homogeny. Different "cultures" that all speak the same
language, share the same moral code and worship the same gods is a total
cop-out. Martin, meanwhile, gives us a
world full of different languages, beliefs and religions. "Good" people in one culture are "bad" by the
standards of the next. Social issues are
a constant undercurrent, even though they never drive the main plot of the
story. Disability and disease are a fact
of life. Several of his characters have
physical and mental challenges; people are mean to them, they suffer, they
survive. I think Martin must know someone,
perhaps a family member, who has some challenge, because his portrayals are
dead-on. Not to be a total social
warrior, here, but someone I love has physical and mental challenges and
sometimes peoples' attitudes about them really bother me. I feel very positive about Martin's inclusion
of characters with challenges in his books, because it affirms the fact that
they belong. The challenges his
characters have are just a fact of who they are--they don't define either their
experiences or their role in the story. Ultimately, our differences make life--and books--interesting.
If you want an author who expertly blends high
fantasy and epic intrigue with real people, then George R. R. Martin is the
author for you.
Leave a comment